Kansas Advances With Unique Digital Reserve Strategy

Kansas is making waves with an innovative proposal to establish a “Bitcoin and digital asset reserve” in its state treasury. Introduced by Republican Senator Craig Bowser, Senate Bill 352 (SB 352), which is already under review by the Senate’s Financial Institutions and Insurance Committee, suggests the creation of a reserve funded exclusively by revenues from digital assets considered “abandoned” under state law. The bill, unique in its approach, would require separate legislative approval for spending.

How Abandoned Assets will Fuel the Reserve?

The innovative SB 352 proposes the establishment of a digital reserve fund within Kansas’ financial landscape. This fund seeks to draw solely from airdrop and staking revenues of digital assets classified as “abandoned.” The bill refrains from indicating any other funding sources, keeping the focus strictly on secondary revenues.

To define “abandonment,” SB 352 aligns with the Unclaimed Property Act’s amendments. If communication is undeliverable due to “address not found” for three years, the digital asset is labeled abandoned. Similarly, if there are no signs of owner involvement, it reaches the same status. This three-year period is notably shorter than the five-year window for other types of deposits.

Will it Influence Crypto Campaign Donations and State Rivalries?

The proposal doesn’t stop there. Senator Bowser also filed SB 310 to manage cryptocurrencies in campaign contributions. It mandates the use of U.S.-based processors for crypto donations, adhering to Know Your Customer (KYC) protocols. These donations need to be converted into U.S. dollars promptly, within three days, prohibiting campaigns from directly holding digital currencies.

Kansas emerges as it tackles broader trends in certain states aiming to hold Bitcoin reserves. Other states are implementing similar measures. New Hampshire, Texas, and Arizona have passed legislation that paves the way for state-held digital reserves, with significant constraints such as asset caps.

• New Hampshire: Strategic Act implemented with specific asset limits.
• Texas: Legislative support for Bitcoin investments achieved.
• Arizona: Created a reserve basis by bypassing mandatory sales of digital assets.

States like Florida and West Virginia are contemplating comparable proposals for the next legislative sessions. West Virginia seeks to allocate a part of state funds into digital holdings, while Pennsylvania explores supporting digital reserve initiatives. Despite growing interest, states like Montana and Wyoming face hurdles in legislative progression.

Senator Bowser commented on the advancing proposal, stating,

“Kansas is seizing an opportunity to lead in the strategic incorporation of digital assets into its financial framework.”

As more states engage in similar endeavors, the Kansas initiative could serve as a model, influencing nationwide policies in the constantly evolving digital asset landscape.