Trump Pushes Forward on Crypto Legislation: Will 2026 Be the Tipping Point?

Since Trump took office, expectations for significant cryptocurrency legislation have soared. Yet, progress has been slow, with only the GENIUS Act concerning stablecoins passing successfully. Meanwhile, the CLARITY proposal aimed at providing market transparency remains embroiled in controversy. There’s growing apprehension about meeting legislative deadlines to avoid 2026 efficacy issues.

What Lies Ahead for Crypto Legislation in 2026?

Several executive orders from Trump regarding cryptocurrencies have paved the way for potential reforms. His appointees have embraced a pro-crypto stance, but these measures don’t match the durability of formal legislation. Changes in leadership or presidency could easily reverse executive directives, unlike laws that remain unaffected by such shifts.

For sustained enthusiasm in the crypto industry, advancements in crypto-friendly laws are critical. However, 2026 brings midterm elections closer, limiting the timeframe for comprehensive legislative action.

Ongoing dialogues within Senate Banking and Senate Agriculture Committees aiming to push forward a market structure proposal have reached a stalemate. Anticipated reports suggest further postponements, particularly due to the elections, casting doubt on any significant breakthroughs this year.

“We are in a midterm election year. Legislative sessions will conclude earlier than usual.”

“The proposal faces numerous unresolved issues and lacks bipartisan support in the Senate. The chance of it passing this year is questionable.”

Who Calls the Shots: Banks or the Crypto Sector?

In the U.S., while lobbying is a norm, crypto lobbyists find themselves against banking forces. The GENIUS Act, an approved law inhibiting stablecoin issuers from offering interest on dollar-backed digital tokens, underscores this rift.

Highlighting a loophole in the GENIUS Act, banks argue that third parties potentially granting stablecoin rewards necessitate market structure commitments. However, the crypto sector expressed dissent over the Senate Banking draft, regarding it as an advantage for banks.

Coinbase’s call for essential stablecoin incentives led to the legislative process being suspended. The Senate Banking Committee anticipates redirecting its efforts towards housing laws, with a probable revisit of the market structure plan by early 2026, barring other pressing issues.

Democrats continue to advocate for a political ethics provision in cryptocurrency discussions. Their unwavering stance during GENIUS talks remains firm. As the legislative process extends to March, consensus is lacking. Crafting a bipartisan draft, securing majority support in legislative chambers, and obtaining Trump’s endorsement may require up to two months.

• Congressional summer recess is expected from August 10 to September 7, 2026.
• A brief session follows before another hiatus for midterm elections starting November 6.
• Time constraints emphasize the need for timely regulatory action.

With these developments, the path toward effective crypto regulation remains complex and time-sensitive. As 2026 approaches, all eyes are on Congress to see if they can overcome these hurdles and propel the cryptocurrency sector forward.